|
Hardware Use this board for problem solving and the discussion of Computer Hardware issues |
|
Topic Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can Someone Please Explain My Quad Core Processor? (moved from Vista forum)
I just recently purchased a new HP desktop with Windows Vista, 3 GB of RAM and an AMD quad-core 9500 Phenom processor. It says that it runs at 2.2Ghz. What ecactly does that mean considering I have a quad-core? What does the 9500 represent? When I'm looking at games specs on the boxes the requirements usually say something like minimally you need a 2.8Ghz or something. My machine is brand new and has one of the best processors available, and it is only 2.2Ghz. Is this right or do you multiply it by 4 because it is a quad-core? I guess I really don't understand exactly what the "quad-core" actually means. What exactly are the advantages and disadvantages of having a quard-core processor? Can someone shed some light on this for me?
Thanks for your time! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also keep in mind that the performance of a computer does not depend solely on the CPU. Graphics card, memory (amount and speed), even hard drive speeds among others affect overall performance. Lacking in one area can sometimes be made up for in other components. Though, lacking in some certain areas can nullify any benefits attempted by other components. Quote:
Now you question what is the real benefit of a quad core CPU. Well, versus a single core CPU of the same speed, it can potentially do 4 times as much work in the same time (but will never do so in practice). If you've been taking in what I was saying above, you're probably wondering why don't they just make a single core CPU that runs 4 times faster, surely that would be better. The answer is, it would be better, but we simply can't, with current technology, run CPUs that fast. They require too much power, they generate too much heat that can't be dissipated efficiently enough, and they place too much of a stress on the materials of the CPU. A car going at 400Kmh is great, but you're going to destroy the engine or blow it up if you have it always running at that speed. This is why focus has recently shifted onto not making CPUs faster, but make them able to take on more workload simultaneously - with more cores. If/when we come up with technologies to replace silicone, maybe GHz will be king again. But for now, we've pushed clock speed as far as possible, so we have to rely on more cores to increase performance. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! Thanks so much for your explanations. Now my question is, that if I am a gamer, should I have focused more on buying just a dual-core machine with a higher Ghz instead of the lower 2.2 Ghz quad-core machine? Please tell me that I'm wrong in my assumptions and that I made a fine choice to purchase the AMD quad-core processor.
- manooly |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
It depends on the type of games, and sometimes, the exact game, as to what benefit you get from a quad core. I would say, at this time, there aren't many games that take advantage of quad cores. Supreme Commander would be an excellent candidate.
Most other RTSs will do fine with a dual core. FPSs will usually be better off with a more powerful single core CPU and a decent graphics card. Even a dual core would do ok. But, there aren't many dual cores that run faster than the current quad cores anyway. I would say, a dual core vs quad core for an FPS, there will be little difference in performance. The quad core would definitely still perform better than an equivalent or slightly better dual core, but certainly not enough to justify the price difference. If you bought a quad solely for FPS gaming, you wasted your money. The exception here would be Crysis, or anything based on CryENGINE 2, which would make use of any spare resource you throw at it. Various other genres will have varying amounts of benefits with quad cores, but generally, the quad won't do much better than a dual. Of course, this only indicates performance with just the game. Performance also depends on other factors, like if you have a lot of programs running in the background. The more programs you run, the more a quad core will be of benefit. |
Bookmarks |
«
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
»
|
|
Similar Topics | ||||
Topic | Topic Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Core i7 870 Processor - 2.93GHz, LGA 1156, 8MB L3 Cache, Quad-Core, Lynnfield? | pops1890 | Windows XP | 0 | January 11th, 2010 02:11 AM |
Dual Core, Triple Core or Quad Core? | Combeter Man | Hardware | 5 | July 14th, 2009 04:08 AM |
Quad core temp's (Moved from Vista Forum) | mudassar | Hardware | 5 | October 11th, 2008 07:07 PM |
Processor Help (Moved from Vista Forum) | demongod | Hardware | 4 | July 17th, 2008 03:15 AM |
Quad-Core AMD VS. Intel Core 2 Quad | nsl | The Anything Else Board | 7 | October 1st, 2007 02:19 PM |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 PM.